Disclosure: I earn 30% recurring commission for 24 months on ConvertKit signups through their affiliate program. I am going to tell you when Beehiiv or MailerLite is the better choice anyway, because an honest referral converts better than a dishonest one. Tested with an active paid list over 18 months.
ConvertKit rebranded as "Kit" in late 2024, though the ConvertKit name is still widely used and the product is the same. I will use both names interchangeably in this review. The rebrand was primarily a positioning play (moving toward a broader "creator tools" identity) and did not change the core product.
Kit pricing scales with subscriber count. The free plan is generous for testing; paid plans are priced at the mid-to-high range of the email marketing market.
| Plan | Price (1k subs) | Price (5k subs) | Price (10k subs) | Key features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free (Newsletter) | $0 | N/A (max 1k subs) | N/A | Unlimited emails, basic forms, 1 automation, 1 sequence |
| Creator | $29/mo | $66/mo | $99/mo | Unlimited automations, visual builder, all integrations, digital products |
| Creator Pro | $59/mo | $111/mo | $166/mo | + Newsletter referral program, subscriber scoring, advanced reporting |
Price comparison context: At 5,000 subscribers, ConvertKit Creator is $66/month. Beehiiv Scale is $42/month. MailerLite Growing Business is $27/month. ActiveCampaign Lite is $99/month. ConvertKit sits in the middle on price but has the deepest automation of the creator-focused group.
Annual discount: The above prices are monthly billing. Annual billing saves 20%, bringing Creator from $29/month to $25/month at 1k subscribers. Worth doing if you are committed after the free plan proves itself.
ConvertKit's free plan allows up to 1,000 subscribers and includes unlimited email sends, a basic landing page builder, one automation workflow, and one email sequence. For creators just starting their list, this is genuinely sufficient to test whether email works for your audience before paying.
The free plan also includes the digital products commerce feature at no charge, which is unusual. You can sell a product through ConvertKit even on the free tier. The commerce fee on free is 3.5% + $0.30 per transaction; on paid plans it is 0.7% + $0.30.
ConvertKit's automation builder is the clearest reason to choose it over cheaper alternatives. You build visual flows: a subscriber joins a form, enters a welcome sequence, is tagged based on what they click, and gets routed into a product pitch or evergreen nurture sequence based on that tag. The whole flow is visible in a canvas you can read at a glance.
This is not just a UX nicety. Complex automation is where email makes real money: the difference between a flat broadcast newsletter and a behavior-triggered product pitch sequence can be 3-5x the conversion rate. MailerLite has good automation but ConvertKit's builder is cleaner for non-technical creators.
ConvertKit uses tags rather than lists, which solves the list-bloat problem that haunts Mailchimp users. A subscriber exists once in your database and can hold unlimited tags. You can segment by: what products they bought, what links they clicked, which opt-in form they came from, what sequences they completed. This drives open rates of 40-60%+ on targeted segments vs. 20-25% on broadcast emails.
You can sell digital downloads, courses, and subscriptions directly through ConvertKit without a third-party tool. The checkout experience connects natively to the subscriber database: a buyer is automatically tagged, can receive a post-purchase sequence, and can be upsold in your automation flow. For creators selling a $15-100 product, this eliminates the need for a separate Gumroad or Payhip account (though you can use those too).
ConvertKit has maintained strong deliverability since launch. The platform enforces list hygiene by default (inactive subscribers can be automatically removed, reducing bounce rates) and has a good sender reputation. In testing over 18 months, average open rates were 10-15% higher on ConvertKit than the same content sent from a Mailchimp account — partly deliverability, partly the tag-based segmentation improving targeting.
The built-in landing page builder covers most creator use cases: lead magnet opt-in pages, coming soon pages, basic product pages. Not as flexible as a dedicated page builder, but fast to set up and connected to the subscriber database natively. For creators without a separate website, the landing page builder can host a functional email-capture funnel with no other tools needed.
If the quality of your newsletter's reading experience matters (custom fonts, reader web archive, paid subscriptions, ad network access), Beehiiv is better. ConvertKit emails look clean but are plaintext-forward. Beehiiv publishes newsletters as web pages with custom domains, better visual design options, and a built-in ad network. For newsletters that are products in themselves (not just list-building for a course), Beehiiv is the stronger choice.
ConvertKit shows open rate, click rate, and subscriber growth. There is no UTM tracking, no revenue attribution by email or sequence, and no A/B testing on free or Creator plans (Creator Pro adds limited A/B). For creators who want to know which sequences drive sales, you need to set up external attribution tracking. Klaviyo and ActiveCampaign have significantly deeper analytics for the same price range.
MailerLite's Growing Business plan at $27/month (5,000 subscribers) includes unlimited emails, automations, landing pages, and a website builder for 40% less than ConvertKit Creator at the same count. For creators who only need email marketing without the commerce layer, MailerLite is the better value. ConvertKit's premium price is justified specifically when you need the visual automation builder's depth and the commerce integrations.
Some competitors (Beehiiv's network, Circle, Ghost) are building community and content hosting alongside email. ConvertKit is email + commerce and does not offer community or hosting features. If you want an all-in-one creator platform, ConvertKit is not it; it is a focused email and light commerce tool.
| Factor | ConvertKit | Beehiiv | MailerLite | Mailchimp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free plan subs | 1,000 | 2,500 | 1,000 | 500 |
| Automation depth | Best-in-class | Basic | Good | Medium |
| Digital commerce | Native (0.7%) | No | No | Limited |
| Newsletter UX | Clean | Best | Clean | OK |
| Price (5k subs) | $66/mo | $42/mo | $27/mo | $75/mo |
| Deliverability reputation | Excellent | Good | Good | Variable |
Yes, use ConvertKit if: You create and sell digital products (courses, templates, coaching programs, digital downloads) and want email and commerce in one place. You want complex behavior-based automation (tagging, branching sequences, post-purchase flows) without coding. You are a coach or course creator where email is your primary sales channel. You have outgrown MailerLite's automation depth and need more sophisticated segmentation. You value deliverability and are willing to pay a premium for it.
No, skip ConvertKit if: You are just starting out (0-500 subscribers) and not yet selling anything — start free on ConvertKit or Beehiiv and evaluate paid when you have real subscriber numbers. You want the best newsletter-as-publication experience (Beehiiv is better for this specific case). You need email marketing only without commerce (MailerLite saves you $40+/month at the same subscriber count). You are a B2B company needing CRM-level automation (ActiveCampaign is more appropriate).
Start ConvertKit Free (up to 1,000 subscribers) →Yes. ConvertKit rebranded to "Kit" in late 2024. The product, features, and pricing are the same. The app.convertkit.com URL still works, and both names are used interchangeably across the industry. The rebrand was primarily a strategic positioning move and had no impact on existing accounts or features.
ConvertKit has consistently outperformed Mailchimp on deliverability in tests I have run over 18 months. Mailchimp's deliverability has suffered partly because they allow a wider range of senders (including marketers with lower-quality practices), which affects sender reputation across their infrastructure. ConvertKit enforces stricter list hygiene defaults, which keeps sender reputation higher. Exact deliverability depends heavily on your own list quality, but ConvertKit is the lower-risk choice for list quality management.
Yes. ConvertKit has a migration guide and concierge migration service (for Creator Pro plans). The migration involves exporting your Mailchimp subscriber CSV, importing to ConvertKit with tag mapping, and rebuilding your automations in ConvertKit's visual builder. The automation rebuild is the main effort — most creators take 2-5 hours depending on complexity. ConvertKit's migration team can help on paid plans.
Limited. Creator Pro adds A/B testing for email subject lines and sender names. There is no landing page A/B testing or full content split testing. For serious A/B testing of email content, Klaviyo or ActiveCampaign are more capable. ConvertKit's A/B features are sufficient for basic subject line optimization but not for systematic conversion rate testing.
Yes. ConvertKit supports GDPR compliance features: data export, subscriber deletion, double opt-in forms, and consent tracking. The platform processes data under Standard Contractual Clauses for EU data transfers. For EU-based creators, these features are sufficient for GDPR compliance with proper configuration.
Beehiiv. If your model is a paid newsletter subscription (subscribers pay $5-15/month for access), Beehiiv is purpose-built for this. They have 0% commission on paid subscriptions (vs. Substack's 10%), a better reading experience, and a built-in ad network. ConvertKit can run paid newsletters but it is not the product's primary use case. See our Beehiiv vs ConvertKit comparison for a detailed breakdown.
Affiliate disclosure: the ConvertKit link above earns a 30% recurring commission for 24 months. I have been a paying ConvertKit customer for 18 months. The commission does not change my verdict; I direct readers to Beehiiv or MailerLite when those are the better fit.